This paper reports imagery ratings for 338 nouns by a method similar to that of Paivio. For 111 of the nouns a comparison with ratings reported by Paivio with those reported here yielded a correlation of 0.944. Selection of nouns rated for this study was made from stimulus terms employed in various free-word-association studies.
{"text": ["Your ratings will be made on a 7-point scale, where 1 is the low imagery end of the scale and 7 is the high imagery end of the scale.", "Make your rating by writing the number from I to 7 that best indicates your judgment of the ease or difficulty of getting a mental image of an object or an event to a word in the set.", "Use the entire range of numbers, from 1 to 7; at the same time, don't be concerned about how often you use a particular number as long as it is your true judgment.", "Work fairly quickly but do not be careless in your judgments."]}