There is increasing interest in the role that manipulability plays in processing objects. To date, Magni{\'{e}}, Besson, Poncet, and Dolisi's (2003) manipulability ratings, based on the degree to which objects can be uniquely pantomimed, have been the reference point for many studies. However, these ratings do not fully capture some relevant dimensions of manipulability, including whether an object is graspable and the extent to which functional motor associations above and beyond graspability are present. To address this, we collected ratings of these dimensions, in addition to ratings of familiarity and age of acquisition (AoA), for a set of 320 black-and-white photographs of objects. Familiarity and AoA ratings were highly correlated with previously reported ratings of the same dimensions (r = .853, p {\textless} .001, and r = .771, p {\textless} .001, respectively), validating the present norms. Grasping and functional use ratings, in contrast, were more moderately correlated with Magni{\'{e}} et al.'s pantomime manipulability ratings (r = .507, p {\textless} .001). These results were taken as evidence that the new manipulability ratings collected in this research capture distinct aspects of object manipulability. The complete stimuli and norms from this study may be downloaded from http://brm.psychonomic-journals.org/content/supplemental.