CVCVC (319) words and paralogs previously assessed for associative reaction time (RT) by Taylor and Kimble were assessed for rated frequency (a′) and scaled rated meaningfulness (m′) following procedures used by Noble. Reliability of the a′ scale, based on three intergroup correlations, resulted in rs of .92, .90 and .89. Reliability of the m′ scale, based on an internal consistency test resulted in a mean discrepancy between the 128 empirical proportions and their corresponding theoretical proportions of 2.4; that is, the average error of reproducing all the original data from m′ scaled values was 2.4{\%}. The r between m′ and RT was .71.
Ss were instructed to indicate on a five-point rating scale the relative number of associations evoked by a verbal stimulus, that is, Ss rated stimuli on a schedule labeled "None," "Below Average," "Average," "Above Average," "Very Many."