In “Response to Elliott and Valenza, 'And Then There Were None'”, (1996) Donald Foster has taken strenuous issue with our Shakespeare Clinic's final report, which concluded that none of the testable Shakespeare claimants, and none of the Shakespeare Apocrypha poems and plays – including Funeral Elegy by W.S. – match Shakespeare. Though he seems to accept most of our exclusions – notably excepting those of the Elegy and A Lover's Complaint – he believes that our methodology is nonetheless fatally flawed by “worthless figures ... wrong more often than right”, “rigorous cherry–picking”, “playing with a stacked deck”, and “conveniently exil[ing] ... inconvenient data.” He describes our tests as “foul vapor” and “methodological madness.”