Over 15 years ago, Ward and Birner (2006) suggested that non-canonical constructions in English can serve both to mark information status and to structure the information flow of discourse.One such construction is preposing, where a phrasal constituent appears to the left of its canonical position, typically sentenceinitially.But computational work on discourse has, to date, ignored non-canonical syntax.We take account of non-canonical syntax by providing quantitative evidence relating NP/PP preposing to discourse relations.The evidence comes from an LLM mask-filling task that compares the predictions when a mask is inserted between the arguments of an implicit intersentential discourse relation -first, when the right-hand argument (Arg2) starts with a preposed constituent, and again, when that constituent is in canonical (post-verbal) position.Results show that (1) the top-ranked maskfillers in the preposed case agree more often with "gold" annotations in the Penn Discourse TreeBank (Webber et al., 2019) than they do in the latter case, and (2) preposing in Arg2 can affect the distribution of discourse-relational senses.