We present the results of the joint student response analysis (SRA) and 8th recognizing textual entailment challenge. The goal of this challenge was to bring together researchers from the educational natural language processing and computational semantics communities. The goal of the SRA task is to assess student responses to questions in the science domain, focusing on correctness and completeness of the response content. Nine teams took part in the challenge, submitting a total of 18 runs using methods and features adapted from previous research on automated short answer grading, recognizing textual entailment and semantic textual similarity. We provide an extended analysis of the results focusing on the impact of evaluation metrics, application scenarios and the methods and features used by the participants. We conclude that additional research is required to be able to leverage syntactic dependency features and external semantic resources for this task, possibly due to limited coverage of scientific domains in existing resources. However, each of three approaches to using features and models adjusted to application scenarios achieved better system performance, meriting further investigation by the research community.